LONDON · ISLAMABAD · WARSAW · WISCONSIN
LexForm
People Expertise Insights About Get in Touch

Contact

+92-323-2999999

London · Islamabad · Warsaw · Wisconsin

WhatsApp

Review Petition before Supreme Court

Supreme Court  ·  Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Article 188 read with Order XXVI Supreme Court Rules 1980

Preview the document

This is the full content of the .docx. yellow markers show the fields you fill in.

IN THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN AT ISLAMABAD

Review Petition No. _____ of year

petitioner_name ... Petitioner

VERSUS

respondent_name ... Respondent

REVIEW PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 188 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 READ WITH ORDER XXVI OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 1980

Respectfully submitted:

1. That this petition seeks review of the judgment and order dated judgment_date delivered by this Honourable Court in case_reference, whereby nature_of_judgment.

2. That the judgment is liable to be reviewed on the grounds specified in Order XXVI Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, namely: (a) discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the Petitioner or could not be produced when the decision was delivered; (b) mistake or error apparent on the face of the record; or (c) any other sufficient reason.

3. That at the time of the original hearing, the Petitioner and his counsel were not in possession of new_evidence_description, which is material to the case and which has now come to light.

4. That the Petitioner has exercised due diligence in attempting to secure the aforementioned evidence and diligence_details. The evidence is new in the sense that it was not available at the time of the original hearing despite reasonable efforts.

5. That the newly discovered evidence is of such a character and significance that evidence_significance, and would have been decisive of the case had it been presented before this Honourable Court.

6. That alternatively, the impugned judgment is liable to review on the ground that there is a manifest error apparent on the face of the record. manifest_error_details.

7. That error_impact which is a patent contradiction and demonstrates clear error in the reasoning or application of law.

8. That the Petitioner has not raised any ground which was or could have been raised at the time of the original hearing. The application for review is therefore maintainable and is filed within the prescribed period of thirty days from the date of the impugned judgment.

9. That the interests of justice require that this Honourable Court review its judgment in consideration of the new evidence and the errors of law apparent on the face of the record. additional_reason.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to:

(a) Review and set aside the judgment and order dated judgment_date delivered in case_reference;

(b) Rehear the matter on merits taking into account the newly discovered evidence and/or the errors apparent on the record; and

(c) Pass such further or other order as deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case.

VERIFICATION

Verified on solemn affirmation at verification_place on this _____ day of _____, year, that the contents of the above petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed.

_____________________________ petitioner_name Petitioner Through: _____________________________ counsel_name Advocate

Scroll inside the document to read the full template.

Ready to use this template? Download or fill it in your browser.

Download .docx

Free. No email required to download.

Related templates

Need a lawyer to file this?

If you would prefer a Barrister to draft, vet, or file the document for you, get in touch. Initial consultation is free.

Email Us WhatsApp +92-323-2999999