Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) · Sales Tax Act 1990, Section 45-B
This is the full content of the .docx. yellow markers show the fields you fill in.
BEFORE THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), city
Sales Tax Appeal No. appeal_number of year
appellant_name, appellant_status, Registration No. sales_tax_registration, appellant_address APPELLANT VERSUS The Inland Revenue Officer, tax_office_name, tax_office_location RESPONDENT
Memorandum of Appeal under Section 45-B of the Sales Tax Act 1990
1. The appellant hereby appeals against the order dated impugned_order_date passed by passing_authority whereby brief_order_description. The appellant is aggrieved by the said order and seeks the intervention of this forum for redressal of the grievance.
2. The appellant is appellant_business_description. The appellant is registered with the Federal Board of Revenue under the Sales Tax Act 1990 with Registration No. sales_tax_registration. The appellant has a clean tax compliance record and has faithfully discharged all statutory obligations under the Sales Tax Act 1990 and the rules framed thereunder.
3. The present appeal is filed within 30 days of the communication of the impugned order as required under Section 45-B of the Sales Tax Act 1990. The appellant has complied with all procedural requirements including the deposit of pre_deposit_amount as pre-deposit, as mandated by the law.
4. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows: background_facts. These facts form the foundation of the appeal.
5. By the impugned order dated impugned_order_date, the respondent specific_order_action. This action was taken without consideration of material evidence, without affording the appellant a proper hearing, and in violation of the settled principles of administrative law.
6. The impugned order is factually incorrect and legally unsustainable. factual_errors. The respondent has wholly misinterpreted the relevant provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1990.
7. The respondent appears to have ignored documentary evidence submitted by the appellant. supporting_documents. These documents clearly establish the appellant's case and defeat the respondent's reasoning.
8. The determination of taxable supplies and the computation of input tax credit have been done erroneously by the respondent. computation_errors. The correct computation, as shown by the appellant, leads to a significantly lower tax liability.
9. The impugned order is also in violation of the principles of natural justice insofar as the appellant was not afforded a fair hearing and an opportunity to present its case in detail before the respondent made the determination.
10. The law is well-settled through numerous decisions of superior courts that a tax authority must exercise its powers in a reasonable and rational manner, considering all relevant facts and evidence. case_law_reference.
11. The imposition of penalties, if any, is unjustified and disproportionate. The appellant has acted in good faith and any inadvertent error, if any, does not warrant the imposition of penalties.
12. In law and on the facts, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. The respondent should be directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law and the principles of natural justice, or in the alternative, to reduce the tax liability to the correct quantum as calculated by the appellant.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this forum may be pleased to: (a) Set aside the impugned order dated impugned_order_date in its entirety; (b) Direct the respondent to pass a fresh order in accordance with law and the provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1990; (c) Reduce the tax liability assessed to corrected_tax_liability as against assessed_tax_amount, with corresponding reduction in penalties and interest; (d) Direct the respondent to refund the amount of refund_amount (if applicable) along with statutory interest; (e) Award such further relief as this forum deems appropriate in the circumstances of the case; and (f) Award costs in favor of the appellant.
VERIFICATION
I, appellant_authorized_person, authorized_person_designation of appellant_name, do hereby solemnly affirm on oath that the contents of this memorandum of appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further confirm that no appeal on the same subject matter has been filed before any other forum.
Signed: appellant_signature appellant_authorized_person authorized_person_designation Through counsel: counsel_name Barrister-at-Law / Chartered Accountant counsel_address Phone: counsel_phone Email: counsel_email Dated: date_of_appeal
Scroll inside the document to read the full template.
Ready to use this template? Download or fill it in your browser.
Free. No email required to download.
If you would prefer a Barrister to draft, vet, or file the document for you, get in touch. Initial consultation is free.