High Court · Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Article 199 read with Article 212
This is the full content of the .docx. yellow markers show the fields you fill in.
IN THE court_designation (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
Writ Petition No. _____ of year
petitioner_name, petitioner_status, petitioner_address ... Petitioner
VERSUS
respondent_designation, respondent_status, respondent_address ... Respondent
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 READ WITH ARTICLE 212 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1973 FOR SERVICE MATTERS
Respectfully submitted:
1. That this Writ Petition is filed under Article 199 read with Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, seeking the issuance of an appropriate writ order writ_sought directing the respondent to relief_described. The Petitioner challenges the action_challenged as being violative of the Petitioner's constitutional rights and the provisions of the Civil Service Rules.
2. That the Petitioner is a public servant who has served the department_name in the capacity of petitioner_designation since date_of_appointment. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the nature_of_grievance of the respondent, and possesses locus standi to move this Honourable Court.
3. That on date_of_action, the respondent issued an order description_of_order. The order was communicated to the Petitioner on date_of_communication. A copy of the impugned order is annexed as Annexure 'A'.
4. That the impugned action is illegality_described, and is not authorized by the applicable_law. The respondent has no power to power_exceeded under the Civil Service Rules or the Constitution of Pakistan.
5. That the impugned order violates violated_principle, which is principle_explanation. The order is moreover nature_of_illegality and therefore cannot stand in law.
6. That the procedural requirements laid down in applicable_procedure have not been complied with. The Petitioner was not given notice of the proceedings notice_detail, nor was any opportunity afforded to the Petitioner to explain his/her position.
7. That the respondent acted in violation of the principles of natural justice by violation_detail. The order was not preceded by any inquiry, investigation, or formal proceeding as required by law and the Constitution.
8. That the grounds alleged against the Petitioner are grounds_disputed, and are wholly grounds_characterization. The Petitioner has at all times discharged his/her duties with diligence and competence.
9. That the impugned order has caused irreparable injury to the Petitioner in the form of injury_described. The order has consequences_detailed, thereby ruining the Petitioner's service record and career prospects.
10. That the respondent has failed or refused to consider considerations_required, which are material to the propriety of the action. The non-consideration of these factors renders the order arbitrary and mala fide.
11. That the Petitioner has brought the matter to the attention of the respondent through representation_detail on date_of_representation, but without any response or reconsideration of the order.
12. That the impugned order is grossly disproportionate to the alleged_fault and is proportionality_breach. No person of reasonable mind could regard the impugned order as a proportionate response.
13. That the respondent's action is manifestly arbitrary and unsupported by any evidence or rational basis. case_law_reference. The order cannot be upheld as being in conformity with the rule of law.
14. That the Petitioner comes before this Honourable Court with clean hands and in good faith. The petition is not filed for any collateral purpose but solely for the redress of the injustice perpetrated against the Petitioner.
GROUNDS
I. That the respondent acted without lawful authority or jurisdiction in issuing the impugned order, thereby exceeding the powers conferred by law.
II. That the impugned order violates the principles of natural justice by not affording the Petitioner the opportunity to be heard before action was taken.
III. That the respondent failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the Civil Service Rules and the statutory framework applicable to service matters.
IV. That the impugned order is arbitrary, unreasonable, and unsupported by any factual or legal foundation.
V. That the action taken by the respondent is grossly disproportionate and violates the doctrine of proportionality.
VI. That the respondent's action is mala fide and motivated by extraneous and irrelevant considerations.
LIMITATION AND ALTERNATE REMEDY: The present petition is filed at the earliest available opportunity. No alternate adequate remedy is available, or where any alternate remedy exists, it is not an efficacious remedy in the facts and circumstances of the case.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to:
(a) Issue an appropriate writ writ_sought to quash the impugned order dated date_of_action;
(b) Declare the impugned order to be declaration_sought;
(c) Direct the respondent to relief_direction;
(d) Award costs and such other relief as may be deemed just and proper.
VERIFICATION
Verified on solemn affirmation at verification_place on this _____ day of _____, year, that the contents of the above Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
_____________________________ petitioner_name Petitioner Through: _____________________________ counsel_name Advocate
Scroll inside the document to read the full template.
Ready to use this template? Download or fill it in your browser.
Free. No email required to download.
If you would prefer a Barrister to draft, vet, or file the document for you, get in touch. Initial consultation is free.