Review Petition before Board of Revenue

BEFORE THE LEARNED BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, AT LAHORE

REVIEW PETITION NO. petition_number OF year

petitioner_name, son of petitioner_father, resident of petitioner_address, petitioner_district Versus respondent_name, son of respondent_father, resident of respondent_address, respondent_district And The District Officer/Additional Commissioner/Tehsil Officer, district

Your Petitioner respectfully submits that the impugned order/decision dated impugned_order_date passed by impugned_authority in case_reference is illegal, without jurisdiction, and warrants interference by this Honourable Board under Section 164 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act 1967.

The petitioner is aggrieved party in the above-mentioned revenue case. The impugned order has caused grave prejudice to the petitioner by brief_injury. The order is based on misinterpretation of law, misapplication of facts, and is patently arbitrary.

The facts of the case are as follows: case_facts. The impugned authority failed to consider material evidence on record and relied upon inadmissible and hearsay evidence in passing the impugned order.

The following substantive grounds are pressed in support of this petition: GROUND 1: ground_1 GROUND 2: ground_2 GROUND 3: ground_3 Each of these grounds independently constitutes sufficient cause to revisit and set aside the impugned order. Taken together, they demonstrate a manifest error of jurisdiction, misapplication of law, and breach of principles of natural justice. The decision impugned is founded on material misapprehension of facts and ignores critical documentary and oral evidence placed before the original authority. Such errors warrant immediate intervention.

The following substantive grounds are pressed in support of this petition: GROUND 1: ground_1 GROUND 2: ground_2 GROUND 3: ground_3 Each of these grounds independently constitutes sufficient cause to revisit and set aside the impugned order. Taken together, they demonstrate a manifest error of jurisdiction, misapplication of law, and breach of principles of natural justice. The decision impugned is founded on material misapprehension of facts and ignores critical documentary and oral evidence placed before the original authority. Such errors warrant immediate intervention.

ground_2

ground_3

It is therefore respectfully prayed that the impugned order dated impugned_order_date be set aside, and the case be remanded to the impugned_authority for reconsideration in light of law and proper appreciation of evidence.

It is respectfully submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside on all the grounds mentioned hereinabove. The petitioner has a strong and legitimate case for reconsideration of the decision taken by the revenue authority. The Board's discretion under Section 164 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act 1967 must be invoked to confirm that justice is not only done but manifestly seen to be done.

IN THE RESULT, the petitioner prays for the following relief(s): 1. The impugned order dated impugned_order_date be SET ASIDE; 2. The case be REMANDED to the impugned_authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law; 3. Costs of this petition.

That this Honourable Court has the jurisdiction to entertain the present petition by virtue of the constitutional or statutory framework above. No other adequate or efficacious remedy is available to the Petitioner, and any alternate remedy that may exist is illusory or onerous in the facts and circumstances of the case.

PRAYER

In view of the foregoing, the Applicant / Petitioner / Complainant most respectfully prays that the Honourable Authority may be pleased to:

(a) Allow the present review petition under Section 164 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act 1967;

(b) Set aside the impugned order of the Board / lower revenue authority dated impugned_order_date;

(c) Restore the position of the Petitioner in the revenue record as it existed prior to the impugned order;

(d) Pass any incidental order necessary to give effect to the review; and

(e) Pass any other order that the Board may consider just, fit, and proper.

petitioner_counsel_name Advocate for Petitioner Enrolled on Roll No. advocate_roll_no Issue dated: filing_date