LONDON · ISLAMABAD · WARSAW · WISCONSIN
LexForm
People Expertise Insights About Get in Touch

Contact

+92-323-2999999

London · Islamabad · Warsaw · Wisconsin

WhatsApp

Writ Petition under Article 199

High Court  ·  Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Article 199

Preview the document

This is the full content of the .docx. yellow markers show the fields you fill in.

IN THE court_designation (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Writ Petition No. _____ of year

petitioner_name, petitioner_status, petitioner_address ... Petitioner

VERSUS

respondent_designation, respondent_status, respondent_address ... Respondent

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN 1973

Respectfully submitted:

1. That this Writ Petition is filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, seeking the issuance of an appropriate writ order directing the respondent to perform his statutory duty or cease from acting in excess of jurisdiction. The Petitioner seeks writ_type_sought to remedy the nature_of_wrong.

2. That the Petitioner is a person aggrieved by the description_of_action of the respondent, and possesses the necessary locus standi to approach this Honourable Court for the redress of grievances. The subject matter of this petition affects the Petitioner's fundamental rights and liberties.

3. That the respondent is a respondent_description and is vested with the authority to perform respondent_duties. The respondent is competent to be sued in his/her official capacity for the acts alleged herein.

4. That the respondent has respondent_action on date_of_action, which constitutes nature_of_violation. The action is contrary to the law and the principles of natural justice.

5. That the respondent acted without proper authority or jurisdiction in taking the aforesaid action. detail_of_jurisdictional_excess, thereby exceeding the bounds of the jurisdiction conferred upon him/her by law.

6. That the respondent failed or refused to perform his/her statutory duty to unfulfilled_duty, which duty arises under source_of_duty. Despite repeated requests and the lapse of time_period, the respondent has not discharged this duty.

7. That the action of the respondent has caused direct injury to the Petitioner in the form of nature_of_injury. The Petitioner has suffered material loss and prejudice as a result of the respondent's conduct.

8. That the respondent's action was taken in violation of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner was not given an opportunity to be heard before the aforesaid action was taken. No notice, hearing, or explanation was afforded.

9. That the Petitioner has exhausted all alternative remedies available to him/her. Representation to the respondent and to the superior authority has been made on date_of_representation, but without any response or relief. The delay in relief has compelled the Petitioner to approach this Honourable Court.

10. That the impugned action is wholly arbitrary, unreasonable, and mala fide. evidence_of_mala_fides. The action was taken with an ulterior motive and not in furtherance of any lawful purpose.

11. That the respondent's conduct is subversive of the rule of law and the constitutional framework. The action strikes at the very foundation of public justice and fair administration of affairs.

12. That the Petitioner has not come to this Honourable Court with unclean hands. The Petitioner has at all times acted in accordance with the law and in good faith. The petition is bona fide and not filed for any collateral purpose.

13. That the respondent's action has become an admitted fact or is self-evident from the record. relevant_legal_principle. The action cannot be sustained in the eyes of law or reason.

GROUNDS

I. That the respondent acted without lawful authority in ground_i_detail, thereby exceeding the limits of jurisdiction.

II. That the respondent failed to discharge ground_ii_detail, which was a mandatory duty under the law.

III. That the respondent violated the principles of natural justice by ground_iii_detail, thereby denying the Petitioner a fair hearing.

IV. That the respondent's action is unreasonable and arbitrary, unsupported by any legal basis or rational consideration of ground_iv_detail.

V. That the respondent's action constitutes an abuse of power and cannot be upheld as being in the interest of justice or the rule of law.

LIMITATION AND ALTERNATE REMEDY: The present petition is filed at the earliest available opportunity. No alternate adequate remedy is available, or where any alternate remedy exists, it is not an efficacious remedy in the facts and circumstances of the case.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to:

(a) Issue an appropriate writ writ_type_sought directed at the respondent to relief_sought_a;

(b) Direct the respondent to relief_sought_b;

(c) Declare the respondent's action to be unlawful, arbitrary, and unconstitutional;

(d) Award costs to the Petitioner and such other relief as may be deemed just and proper.

VERIFICATION

Verified on solemn affirmation at verification_place on this _____ day of _____, year, that the contents of the above Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

_____________________________ petitioner_name Petitioner Through: _____________________________ counsel_name Advocate

Scroll inside the document to read the full template.

Ready to use this template? Download or fill it in your browser.

Download .docx

Free. No email required to download.

Related templates

Need a lawyer to file this?

If you would prefer a Barrister to draft, vet, or file the document for you, get in touch. Initial consultation is free.

Email Us WhatsApp +92-323-2999999